Je viens de tester sur Toulouse: même constat même si le service reste correct:
64 bytes from mail2.generationcable.net (212.83.158.37): icmp_req=10 ttl=54 time=28.0 ms
64 bytes from mail2.generationcable.net (212.83.158.37): icmp_req=11 ttl=54 time=21.8 ms
64 bytes from mail2.generationcable.net (212.83.158.37): icmp_req=12 ttl=54 time=20.5 ms
64 bytes from mail2.generationcable.net (212.83.158.37): icmp_req=13 ttl=54 time=21.2 ms
64 bytes from mail2.generationcable.net (212.83.158.37): icmp_req=14 ttl=54 time=25.1 ms
64 bytes from mail2.generationcable.net (212.83.158.37): icmp_req=15 ttl=54 time=24.1 ms
64 bytes from mail2.generationcable.net (212.83.158.37): icmp_req=16 ttl=54 time=21.7 ms
64 bytes from mail2.generationcable.net (212.83.158.37): icmp_req=17 ttl=54 time=126 ms
64 bytes from mail2.generationcable.net (212.83.158.37): icmp_req=18 ttl=54 time=243 ms
64 bytes from mail2.generationcable.net (212.83.158.37): icmp_req=19 ttl=54 time=20.9 ms
64 bytes from mail2.generationcable.net (212.83.158.37): icmp_req=20 ttl=54 time=21.1 ms
64 bytes from mail2.generationcable.net (212.83.158.37): icmp_req=21 ttl=54 time=22.1 ms
64 bytes from mail2.generationcable.net (212.83.158.37): icmp_req=22 ttl=54 time=26.0 ms
64 bytes from mail2.generationcable.net (212.83.158.37): icmp_req=23 ttl=54 time=21.0 ms
64 bytes from mail2.generationcable.net (212.83.158.37): icmp_req=24 ttl=54 time=24.8 ms
64 bytes from mail2.generationcable.net (212.83.158.37): icmp_req=25 ttl=54 time=24.3 ms
64 bytes from mail2.generationcable.net (212.83.158.37): icmp_req=26 ttl=54 time=21.9 ms
64 bytes from mail2.generationcable.net (212.83.158.37): icmp_req=27 ttl=54 time=93.1 ms
64 bytes from mail2.generationcable.net (212.83.158.37): icmp_req=28 ttl=54 time=20.8 ms
64 bytes from mail2.generationcable.net (212.83.158.37): icmp_req=29 ttl=54 time=21.6 ms
64 bytes from mail2.generationcable.net (212.83.158.37): icmp_req=30 ttl=54 time=21.7 ms
64 bytes from mail2.generationcable.net (212.83.158.37): icmp_req=31 ttl=54 time=27.9 ms
64 bytes from mail2.generationcable.net (212.83.158.37): icmp_req=32 ttl=54 time=20.8 ms
<b>64 bytes from mail2.generationcable.net (212.83.158.37): icmp_req=33 ttl=54 time=113 ms
64 bytes from mail2.generationcable.net (212.83.158.37): icmp_req=34 ttl=54 time=263 ms</b>
64 bytes from mail2.generationcable.net (212.83.158.37): icmp_req=35 ttl=54 time=21.8 ms
64 bytes from mail2.generationcable.net (212.83.158.37): icmp_req=36 ttl=54 time=20.9 ms
64 bytes from mail2.generationcable.net (212.83.158.37): icmp_req=37 ttl=54 time=22.5 ms
64 bytes from mail2.generationcable.net (212.83.158.37): icmp_req=38 ttl=54 time=21.3 ms
64 bytes from mail2.generationcable.net (212.83.158.37): icmp_req=39 ttl=54 time=22.4 ms
64 bytes from mail2.generationcable.net (212.83.158.37): icmp_req=40 ttl=54 time=22.9 ms
64 bytes from mail2.generationcable.net (212.83.158.37): icmp_req=41 ttl=54 time=21.0 ms
Plusieurs possibilités:
- 2 équipements tombe en panne et personne ne s'en aperçoit. Peu probable
- des modifications sur les TDR sont en cours et pas finies.plus probable
Qui sait?
A suivre...
